Abstract:
This explanatory case study investigates the role that Samsung’s Facebook communication
plays in influencing brand reputation from a consumer perspective, amongst consumers
based in Sandton, Johannesburg. For this study, Samsung’s Facebook content between
1st May 2017 and 31st May 2017 was analysed qualitatively, as the first data collection
method. The second method of data collection was in-depth, semi-structured interviews
with participants who are Samsung consumers. Both data collection methods were informed
by the framework for the study, the Urde and Greyser Corporate Brand Identity and
Reputation Matrix, which identifies key contributors to brand reputation. This allowed for a
comparison between how Samsung has positioned itself on Facebook and the consumer
perception of the communication, against the reputational elements of the framework to
assess whether any discrepancies existed between the two perspectives. The study found
that from the consumer perspective, Samsung’s Facebook page is positively aligned in
terms of communicating differentiation, responsibility, recognisability and trustworthiness.
In terms of the reputational element of credibility, participants felt that Samsung could
communicate more strongly to match the needs of more technically-inclined consumers.
With respect to willingness to support on Facebook, participants felt the brand did not truly
encourage two-way communication, and focused rather on product communication.
Relevance, deals with the value that the Samsung brand communicates beyond product oriented
communication, however not all participants felt that Samsung was achieving this
in their Facebook communication. Whilst the researcher concludes that Samsung’s has
created a positive brand reputation through Facebook overall, the paper provides possible
recommendations to remedy the potential discrepancies found to improve and enhance
brand reputation.