IIESpace Repository

Fairness in using negative marking for assessing true/false questions.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Haffejee, Firoza
dc.contributor.author Sommerville, Thomas, E.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-28T13:42:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-28T13:42:35Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11622/20
dc.description.abstract Multiple choice questions are a popular method of testing as they are easy to mark. However, they also lend themselves to guessing. True/False questions are particularly prone to guessing. This can be alleviated by deduction of marks for incorrect answers. The University of KwaZulu-Natal currently uses true/false questions in its assessments, which are answered by means of pencil-and-paper sheets that are optically scanned, marks being calculated according to a standard formula. A trial of a proposed new computer program revealed mark discrepancies compared to the current scheme. This study evaluates the program’s marking scheme ‘internal negative marking’ – whereby an overall negative mark for an item consisting of a stem and several true/false questions is ‘rounded up’ to zero. We enumerate the cause of the discrepancies, demonstrate that the latter scheme diminishes the penalty for guessing and may encourage strategic students to leave out parts of the curriculum when studying. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher The IIE en_US
dc.subject Multiple choice questions en_US
dc.subject Assessment en_US
dc.subject Negative marking en_US
dc.title Fairness in using negative marking for assessing true/false questions. en_US
dc.type Preprint en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Teaching and Learning
    This collection contains approved preprints for submission to "The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning" the accredited open access journal published by The IIE. ISSN: 1818-9687.

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account